nutrients · contextual evidence

Nutrients: species, absolute exposure and heat matter

Montipora digitata · Xenia umbellata

Names as reported by the authors; no accepted-taxon or specimen-identity claim.

Reading the evidence

These records describe traits and results under specific study conditions. They do not establish recommended aquarium settings.

What the study tells us

A nominal N:P ratio does not isolate a ratio effect from phosphate concentration. Increased symbiont density is not equivalent to improved host survival. There is no concurrent cool control through the warming phase.

Study conditions

Five weeks; twelve tanks with 40 L seawater, four tanks per nutrient treatment. First two weeks at 26 degrees C, then 2-degree weekly increments to 32 degrees C. Nominal nitrate 37 micromolar in both enriched groups, phosphate 8 or 2 micromolar (named 5:1 and 19:1 N:P); unenriched control. Light 108 ± 14 micromol photons m−2 s−1, 12:12 light:dark; fragments acclimatized before exposure. Daily mortality plus pulsation, symbiont counts and chlorophyll.

Methods and evidence class

controlled captive experiment

Daily survival counts; sampled pulsation, symbiont density and chlorophyll; Kaplan–Meier/log-rank survival comparisons with Holm–Bonferroni adjustment and nonparametric endpoint tests.

Findings

obs-pmc12619941-01

After two weeks at 26 degrees C, the 5:1 enriched group showed a 113% increase in Montipora symbiont density (p=0.021) without mortality, while Xenia pulsation fell to zero relative to control (p=0.01). These endpoints differ by organism and do not define beneficial nutrient targets.

Measurements and uncertainty
  • {"metric": "Montipora symbiont density change", "uncertainty": "p=0.021", "unit_as_published": "%", "value_as_published": "113%"}
Where to find it in the paper

Results / Effect of nutrient enrichment | ./body/sec[3]/sec[1]/p[1]

Read the cited article ↗

obs-pmc12619941-02

Under enrichment followed by warming to 32 degrees C, all Montipora in the 5:1 group died before the experiment ended; Xenia survival probability in that group declined to 13%. Both differed from controls with p less than 0.001.

Measurements and uncertainty
  • {"group": "5:1 plus warming", "metric": "Xenia survival probability", "uncertainty": "p<0.001 versus control", "unit_as_published": "%", "value_as_published": "13%"}
Where to find it in the paper

Results / Combined effect of nutrient enrichment and temperature increase | ./body/sec[3]/sec[3]/p[1]

Results / Combined effect of nutrient enrichment and temperature increase | ./body/sec[3]/sec[3]/p[2]

Results / Differences between coral species | ./body/sec[3]/sec[4]/p[3]

Read the cited article ↗

Limitations and source dependence

  • Temperature increases with time for all treatments; there is no concurrent 26-degree control throughout the heated phase. Time and heat are not fully separable.
  • Changing N:P changes absolute phosphate at fixed nitrate; this design does not isolate a universal ratio effect from concentration effects.
  • Treatment pH means differ (Table 1). Late surviving samples are reduced; no 5:1 Montipora survivors and only two Xenia samples remain for some day-35 assays.
  • Different methods passages give the baseline temperature as 25 and 26 degrees C; this discrepancy remains unresolved.

Both species and all nutrient/temperature endpoints belong to the same 12-tank experiment. Xenia stock from Bremen/northern Red Sea overlaps provenance of PMC10472534; shared stock is not independent-population confirmation.

Evidence family: study-pmc12619941

Method passage locators

Materials & Methods / Study organisms | ./body/sec[2]/sec[1]/p[1]

Materials & Methods / Study organisms | ./body/sec[2]/sec[1]/p[2]

Materials & Methods / Experimental design | ./body/sec[2]/sec[2]/p[1]

Materials & Methods / Experimental design | ./body/sec[2]/sec[2]/table-wrap[1]

Materials & Methods / Experimental design | ./body/sec[2]/sec[2]/p[3]

Materials & Methods / Physiological analysis / Pulsation rate measurements | ./body/sec[2]/sec[3]/sec[1]/p[1]

Materials & Methods / Physiological analysis / Survival analysis | ./body/sec[2]/sec[3]/sec[3]/p[1]

Materials & Methods / Statistical analysis | ./body/sec[2]/sec[4]/p[1]

Source and citation

Differential responses of hard coral Montipora digitata and soft coral Xenia umbellata to nutrient stoichiometry under heat stress ↗

Mezger SD, Littke S, Ostendarp M, de Breuyn M, Wild C. (2025). Differential responses of hard coral Montipora digitata and soft coral Xenia umbellata to nutrient stoichiometry under heat stress. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.20273. ©2025 Mezger et al.This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.20273

CC-BY-4.0 · Original summaries and structured facts adapted by Reefory.

Source retrieval detailsArticle XML ↗

Retrieved 2026-10-03T03:27:32.552959+00:00

Retrieved XML SHA-256: 6cac7286f66814b4ca2eeac9ae4424f3cc40d2cd22751ce7e5d92a09634a6a79